Do you folks think there's any value in the red sweater guy from the episode where Jane kills Timothy Carter (Strawberries and Cream)? It seems a little odd to introduce a "new" character to the show in the last 5 episodes but are we really going to get 5 more episodes of seeing Jane meeting women and playing with children in Mexico. I would definitely take a new character over McAllister being the guy also. Let me know your thoughts! If you're not familiar with the red sweater theory google it.

"Xander is a wonderfully subtle actor who can go deep — deep enough to be our Red John," says series creator/exec producer Bruno Heller,
who says he selected McAllister to be his Big Bad "about a year ago,
after carefully weighing all other options. McAllister made the most
sense. He had the perfect cover job as the sheriff of Napa, where he was
the master of his domain. No one ever questioned his whereabouts. He
didn't have to answer to anyone. He needed that freedom and the quiet
loneliness of the countryside to do his thing as Red John."


So all the clues we got before are useless. Wasn't the audience supposed to be able to solve the RJ case before it would be revealed? Didn't Heller claim that the clues we already gathered would lead to only one person? So how exactly do WE can solve a mystery before it gets revealed when the writer doesn't even know who his f*cking antagonist is?! -.-

Im really dissapointed about McAllister been RJ, i think he sucks hahah.. I hope he isnt real RJ, because come on, the episode was good, but not good if we remember that suppose to be about RJ capture,, RJ asking for mercy, really?? so pathetic, RJ have to say KILL ME IF U CAN PATRICK (with his famous voice) ... All its so confused, i think we are going to see like flash backs, like come on its truuuee he is RJ, OMG know i understand,,,,, why he kill his family, why kill people, what about all his lovers, how he works and a many question without answer about ALL, Partridge, about farm, about janes family, about kirkland and his twin, about visualize,, So i hope this episode is just for thinking "Bruno we hate u"...!!! So i hope Bruno surprise us,, and think OMG Bruno its a genius and give us what we want about RJ....!! BTW I watch the preview and the only thing i cant think its the lady, RED HAIR? no way hahahah,,!! All remember us RJ..!!

I liked the ending and think it makes a lot of sense.  

But I'm puzzled by something...  Possibly another Red Herring...

The lady sitting at the back of the church in The Great Red Dragon when Jane tapes the gun beneath the pew looks pretty familiar...  Looks just like the nun with a knife who was on Red John's side...  She also sounded like she was from Visualize...  (i.e., her tone and choice of words.)


Was she on Tom's side?  If it was her in the Church, did she see Jane put the gun there?  Why be there in the first place?  If she did see Jane put the gun there, is Red John using Tom?  Is she the "cutter-upper"?  I mean, the first episode Tom's in is about 2 sociopaths...  

Also, why didn't she have a gun?  She wasn't that great a shot with a knife...  But Jane and that candle, oh boy...  I think Jane bashing her in the skull made-up for an almost religious moment with Jane kneeling in the last episode...  And of course, he was putting the gun there.

Anyways, I liked the ending.  Think the Sheriff fits very well.  I don't think the pigeon play was far-fetched either, it was actually pretty poetic.

Just my thoughts!  No offense intended! 

Let me ask you all this. WHAT IS LOGICAL ABOUT A PSYCHIC being hired by cops to catch a serial killer that killed his own family?!?!? Whats logical about CBI not being shut down the first 100 times people were killed inside their walls ? Its theatre people ! Not a science class! Heller admitted he didnt know who red john was till this season!!!! Thats a very illogical approach ehh?!?!?!?