Who is Red John?

Share your own theory and rate other people’s

List of seven

Thomas McAllister
Thomas McAllister
Reede Smith
Reede Smith
Ray Haffner
Ray Haffner
Gale Bertram
Gale Bertram
Brett Partridge
Brett Partridge
Bret Stiles
Bret Stiles
Bob Kirkland
Bob Kirkland

LATEST THEORIES

Been a while since I posted here. But thought I'd share something to eliminate a couple suspects from the list of 7 names (even though I believe that list is fake and Heller, as usual, is trying to deceive us, just like he did in the previous season finale interviews.)

Do any of you remember Ashley Gable? She was one of the writers and executive producers for the show for the first 4 seasons. She wrote one of the best RJ episodes, "His Red Right Hand". And she was the one who said we had to look at RJ "like Waldo" (it was her, not Heller).

But most importantly, she said RJ "had already been visible in prior episodes" (yup, plural), before season 4 premiered. In addition, Heller mentioned in an interview last year (for the season 4 finale) that "Red John may have already been cast" and that we "may have already seen him". I know this contradicts one of my previous statements, but note that he didn't confirm it (like he did with the list), he mentioned it as a possibility.

So, neither Kirkland, nor Reede Smith, nor Haffner could be RJ, since they were introduced in seasons 4 and 5. However, Kirkland is one mysterious character, but his obsession with RJ, him warning Lisbon of Tommy Volker (telling her to back off) and his "can we trust her?" conversation with Bertram, make me think he's either a RJ associate (which I hope isn't true, since the whole "associates" thing is getting repetitive) or someone trying to get personal revenge or a very big promotion. Who knows? Haffner fits the profile too, and his connection with Visualize is something we can't overlook.

Also, if you take Gable's words literally (meaning she meant we had seen RJ more than one time by then - although it'd be too obvious to say we had only seen RJ in 1 episode), there's the Sheriff. By the season 5 premiere, we had only seen him in 1 episode (S01E02). I think it'd be safe to rule him out.

Then there's Stiles, Partridge and Bertram left. We had seen all those in more than 1 episode in the first 3 seasons. Although I honestly don't think it's any of them, they have enough reasons to be suspects. I liked Max Winter, CBI Ron and Ellis Mars better.

Anyway, even though this season finale was very disappointing (all of the other season finales had bigger reveals and more action-packed scenes), I can't wait until next season. I think we'll quickly know truly how RJ got the exact names on the list - after all, The Mentalist has always enjoyed finding rational explanations to supernatural phenomena. Don't be silly, they ain't giving RJ no superpowers... yet.

Also, worth mentioning: I liked that theory about the 2 different lists (the real one seen at the ending of the episode after Red Sails in the Sunset, and the fake one created around the time of The Red Barn, if I'm not mistaken). Something I just came up with: Patrick says, since his wife and child were killed, he met an exact number of people, in 2 different episodes, Red Barn and Red John's Rules, both times to Lisbon. If he was lying (if the second list is actually just a con), he could have just made up fake numbers. Did he mention the exact same number both times? I need to redownload those episodes.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

I'm not sure this is a theory about RJ, but it just crossed my mind that if he was Forensic Investigator Brett Partridge, it would turn to be JUST LIKE IN DEXTER (a serial killer who's also a blood analyzer in the Forensic's Department). I don't think Bruno Heller would like to be called a ''copycat''.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely


Ever since the ending of Season 1 I have suspected Patrick to be Red John - in the way he shot that guy at the end of the season 1 who tried to kill Lisbon - who undoubtedly would have led us to Red John. Since then, the awesomeness of such a huge twist has made me see Patrick as Red John in almost every episode.

The opening credits of each TM episode in Season 1 started off with a black screen where the third definition of a Mentalist was: "A master manipulator of thoughts and behavior."

This, coupled with the uncanny resemblance that Simon Baker has to the Red John smiley faces (the droopy eyes, the wry smile and the quiff of hair), made me wonder if we weren't being played right from the outset with regards to who Patrick Jane really is. It would be very bold of Bruno Heller and co to be telling us that we (the audience) are being manipulated, instead of just defining the premise of the show. Very sly and outrageous if so.

Could he be Red John? 

He certainly has the charm and allure to pull off some daring moves. He is the ultimate planner and is able to do things that almost seem magical, given his pinpoint accuracy when reading people. We've seen his capacity to manipulate, and rarely we've been shown his ability to completely hypnotise people and have them do whatever he wants. It would be pretty easy to have so many people idly follow him and end their lives for someone who is able to hypnotise them so well. The premise of the show is that psychics don't exist but we are shown how Patrick clearly has the ability to hypnotise people, thus gaining control of their actions. Most of Red John's minions have a clearly dazed look about them when they speak of him and do self-destructive things for him - it seems possible they are under suggestion (eg Rebecca in Season 2, murdering Bosco and co).. Additionally, during the talk show segment with Panzer (the other serial killer in Season 4), it is so clear how Red John is taunted by Panzer, and the look Patrick has on his face is that of extreme malice, anger and hatred whilst on camera - Panzer is tainting Red John's legacy, and is ultimately killed brutally shortly after the segment. 

The purpose of this post isn't to accuse Patrick Jane as such - just putting the theory out there again. There is a huge proportion of the viewing community who would love to see the ultimate twist - the main hero is the main villain when all is revealed in the finale of the show. 

As time has gone on, with each episode, this theory has had it's ups and downs, and does have a lot going against it, but each time I try and strike it out, another new fact swings it back towards being plausible for me again. However, the finale showed us a list of Red John suspects and we are told that Red John is definitely on that list. Bruno Heller is now saying that "it definitively is not Patrick John".

Once again, you’re making moves that make me wonder if Patrick Jane is Red John — after all, how else could he know that memory from inside his head? But by saying Red John is definitely on the list, can we rule out the theory held by some fans that Jane is actually Red John?
Heller: I would say that definitively: Jane is not Red John.


That does not mean Red John is not Jane. Anyhow, most people will interpret that as Red John being somebody else completely. 

What I do want to bring attention to is that Bruno Heller has said back in 2008 the identity of Red John is a series ender - not a mere afterthought as some point in the show - but a series ender. To me this implies the show has been written from the off with the knowledge of who Red John is and how he came to be and what his relationship with Patrick is going to be. If I had to plan a TV show which introduces an anonymous killer as the main antagonist opposite a super clever, dashing protagonist such as Patrick Jane, knowing that your reveal of the killer would be the backbone of the entire series - my thoughts would be to sit and detail the main story beginning and ending extremely well with a semi hardened plan for the interval episodes/seasons.before filming it. In order to make this work, the antagonist (Red John) would have to feature prominently in the first season, if not the first episode, even if unknown to the viewer. 

This brings me to my point... If it is not Patrick Jane that is Red John, then I am utterly convinced it is someone we were introduced to in the Pilot episode. This ranges from Lisbon (we know little of her backstory), to Cho (whom we hardly ever see) to Rigsby (less likely I have to admit, since we've seen a lot of his father issues and his baby) all the way through to the innocent-looking Van Pelt (who has bright red hair... and has a troubled past pre-dating her shooting of O Laughlin). However, with the reveal that Red John is like Waldo, I am even more inclined to suspect that if he is not Patrick Jane or one of the core team, then he is another recurring character we are introduced to in the Pilot... One who pops up occasionally and goes largely undetected. 

Though I wouldn't be satisfied with this, for me it seems highly likely now that Brett Partridge is by far the most likely candidate for Red John. From the list of seven, he stands out as the one character who we have been given just enough exposure to, to vaguely remember when his reveal as Red John slowly transpires in the season ender, but not so much as to draw attention to him until we hit the final stretch of the show. Bruno Heller has said we will be disappointed when we find out the identity of Red John - and yes I will be slightly disappointed if Brett Partridge is revealed as Red John, even though he does an amazing job as The Ghoul and really has that edge about him - but I am coming from a baseline and very dark theory of having the hero be revealed as the antagonist, hence my disappointment. I won't go into why Brett Partridge is easily the best candidate for Red John, as it has been done on here many times very well (e.g. the voice, the build, the attitude, the right age, the hovering in the background randomly during seasons, the possible infiltration/insider knowledge on CBI business, etc.), except for the one scene in Season 5's finale at the beginning where Lisbon and Jane walk in on the murdered girl while Partridge is talking. The second where Partridge notices Lisbon and acknowledges her is immediately followed by a very poignant angle of the Red John smiley face with the back of Partridge's head. He senses someone (Jane) is standing behind him and then immediately turns so his face is next to the smiley face. We are, quite possibly, shown Red John standing next to his smiley face. If you pause it in that split second** before he sees Jane, he has the exact same smile as the smiley face on the wall, just as there is a tinge of the eery Red John music. Perfect. Again we are being given these tiny clues in every episode.

The majority of casual viewers will find this (Brett Partridge = Red John) interesting enough to be hooked to the final reveal - which, seems like it might be next season, though I hope and pray it is extended to season 7, and that I am right all along and Red John is Patrick Jane (not how I am not contradicting what Bruno Heller says when I say it that way) or one of the four other main characters... 

Finally.. Where does "He is man/r" and what Bosco whispers to Jane and William Blake fit in to all of this?
So far only a Song of Experience has been referenced in TM. I wouldn't be surprised if The Lamb were to be referenced from the  Songs of Innocence as we draw closer to the show's ending. More to follow. 




**if you would like a picture of this scene, please feel free to email me





Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Okay, I watched Episode 1x02 again. Twice. That's the episode Sheriff McAllister is in.

Before I share my thoughts about him, I want to say something else.

You are a writer/screenwriter. You are writing a book or a TV show script. You have this big mystery plot. You do your best. You are spinning the spot. You are putting subtles clues along with some clever red herrings. You continue spinning the plot, more and more. Until you realize the plot has started to spin out of control. But you don't panic, because you are an experienced writer.

Let's say that in this particular TV show, for some reason, you have to present the audience with a list of suspects for the killings in your big mystery plot. You have a bunch of guys, who somewhat fit the profile of the killer and the clues you've planted. But you are not really sure, because you've lost control of the plot. You have to name seven suspects. And you decide to include one or two names, who will serve as an insurance policy, a bailout, just in case. Some obscure characters nobody knows anything about and whose stories you can safely implant in the main story and say "yeah, they were there the whole time, pulling the strings from behind the curtain". It's cheating but it happens, even with good writers.

I am starting to think this is exactly what has happened with The Mentalist and that's why people like Sheriff McAllister and FBI Agent Smith are on the list.

So, I watched Sheriff McAllister's episode.

1. Jane does not shake hands with him onscreen. We see the moment they meet, but we don't see the moment Jane leaves the town. So, yeah, they might have shaken hands when Jane was leaving. Possible, yet unsatisfactory.

2. Lorelei: "I only wonder why the two of you didn't become life-long friends ..."

Okay, maybe Lorelei meant "shook hands" figuratively, so point 1. is not a problem. But the "friends" part? 

What we see from Sheriff McAllister is this: He greets the CBI team and shows them the body of the victim. Jane does his thing describing the circumstances around the murder. A minute later the Sheriff asks Lisbon "who is this guy?", learns Jane is a consultant and starts asking him stupid questions like "are you a clairvoyant, do you have psychic powers" while making funny faces. Janes explains he has no powers and the Sheriff asks him "so what is it you do exactly?" (with a funny/confused voice and a somewhat silly expression again). Then The Sheriff gets beaten by Jane at rock-paper-scissors six times in a row. He seems a little upset, but not much I think.

Then there is the Van Pelt incident when the Sheriff interferes with Jane's plan and is even considered a suspect for a moment. Jane is not there, they do not talk.

And that's it. The Sheriff spends the rest of the episode making more and more strange/funny/silly facial expressions.

There is nothing even remotely special or unusual in his short interactions with Jane. Not onscreen at least.

So, assuming the Sheriff is RJ, tell me this - how can Lorelei even think that Jane and the Sheriff might have become friends? Let alone wonder why they didn't. Life-long friends, yeah, right..

3. The only strange thing I saw was this: When Lisbon and Jane begin questioning that guy Hector, just before he starts talking it seems like he looks at the Sherrif. At least that's the impression we are left with. The Sheriff gives Hector a strange look and we hear a short spooky music. That's it. Probably doesn't mean anything.

4. Rosalind's description + age.

I am not sure if he fits Rosalind's description. He is about the same height as Jane (I think I saw 6 ft being posted here). He is neither muscular, nor soft. He might smell "
of pine and nails and earth" as he is living in the country. We are shown his hands and I don't know if one could describe them as "rough" or "strong". He does not have a gentle voice. He is balding, or at least the actor is.

Age. The actor was born in 1955. If we assume this age for McAllister, this would make him 33 at the time of the Red Barn killings. I am 33 and nobody has called me "kid" for quite some time now.

5. "He is ma". 
I don't know. Someone here posted "He is marshal".

6. Visualize connection. None shown.




I don't know. He seems like a random guy to me. An insurance policy, as I said above. The only somewhat plausible theory I can think of is this: McAllister knows Jane has joined the CBI, so he decides to ask the CBI for help in a local murder case (which he might have orchestrated?) and see how Jane works. That would explain his strange behaviour with Van Pelt - he knows Van Pelt is with the CBI, he knows Jane is watching, he knows Jane will catch the real killer. So he decides to play a little game with Jane or to mock him or whatever.


Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #2901 • By Antonioni
Show this theory

Who else know Patrick deep thoughts?

Patrick Jane is bipolar!

He can hire people to do the dirty work and be the mind behind it.

And Lorelai never killed him because she never saw him.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

I think 6 people of the 7 suspects actually work for Red John and the 7th person (Ray Haffner) is Red John. Red John knew that PJ would narrow the list down to those ones who might look like Red John at some point and all the people who worked for Red John had that potential. These 6 people are the only ones who work for Red John and shook hands with PJ. 

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Like another user I posted in this section to show that Patrick Jane cannot be red john.

1. When the meeting was arranged between RJ and PJ in the limo (RJ was speaking via. speaker), this shows that it can't be PJ as how would he speak to himself? You might argue that "he was imagining it", that would ruin the whole show as the whole thing could just be his imagination. 

2. When Red John was video taping himself stalk FBI agent Susan Darcy PJ was with agent Grace and it wouldn't be possible again for PJ to be stalking Susan while watching it at the same time and we know it was live because they immediately went to find Darcy and she was in the exact place as she was in the video. 

3. I don't think Heller would ruin the whole show by making everything PJ did pointless. Let me clarify, I don't mean that if PJ was RJ it would ruin the show but think about it, it would a made all those episodes and cases completely pointless.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on