Who is Red John?

Share your own theory and rate other people’s

List of seven

Thomas McAllister
Thomas McAllister
Reede Smith
Reede Smith
Ray Haffner
Ray Haffner
Gale Bertram
Gale Bertram
Brett Partridge
Brett Partridge
Bret Stiles
Bret Stiles
Bob Kirkland
Bob Kirkland

LATEST THEORIES

Anyone notice that Heller never said specifically that Red John will be caught/killed by season's end? Here are some quotes from Heller in an interview about Season 6...
"We're going to tell the story and explain who Red John is and what happened and what is going to happen as clearly as possible because the audience deserves that."
"By the end of the season, Red John is long gone."
He never actually says that RJ will be caught and killed/brought to justice. I'm not saying that I think they're going to draw this story out for any longer, but it just seems a little weird. Heller loves tricking the audience by feeding them false information through interviews. But then there's also this...
What if Renfrew meant to write "he is mar"? There doesn't appear to be a trail of blood made by fingers coming from the last letter of the word. "Mar" is a spanish word that can mean "the blue" in english. And the title of episode 9? "My Blue Heaven". Could this mean that we find out who Red John is, but he isn't caught? That the story continues in some other way? What do you guys think?

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #6351 • By danny_red
Show this theory

a couple of days ago i read a theory that said that danny is Red John. A well elaborate theory, by the way.  So i re-watch that episode with danny, and i notice that danny has a voice very similar to Red John's voice. listen for yourself. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9FXn-UKnS0

listen when danny says: "first compliment you ever gave i can recall"

i don't know about you guys, but his voice seems very similar to Red John's voice, adding that theory that i read, it seems that Danny really is Red John.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #6352 • By TheRealRJ
Show this theory

A previous post asked whether Heller actually said that RJ was on the list. MANY others have MISQUOTED Heller on this and it has driven me insane. As I mentioned in a previous post, and am now posting specifically to reiterate:  HE NEVER SAID RJ IS ON THE LIST!!

The original quote, from EW:

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: After all that craftiness
on Patrick Jane’s part, Red John is still a step ahead of him. So can
we really trust that the list is accurate if Red John is so willing to
confirm it?

Bruno Heller
: Yes, we can trust that list. As much as much as
Red John has been one step ahead, Lorelei Martins’ intervention changed
the game. So as much as Red John is trying to play from a position of
strength in reality Jane has gotten a lot closer. This last episode of
the season really sets us up for next season: The hunt is on, no messing
about.

Source: http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/05/06/mentalist-finale-season-6-red-john-list/

So yeah. Take from that what you will but considering we now know there is a fake list, it seems even less solid to assume he means RJ is definitely on the list.

I actually think he probably IS on the list. But Heller's comments are some of the biggest, most important clues and really shouldn't be misquoted / misinterpreted.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Just some thoughts to share ...

In the first episode of Season 6, when RJ's knife is shown up close, when I first saw it, I thought it reminded me of something, but I could not quite place what it was.  Finally, after pausing the scene, it hit me ... the knife resembles the head of a bird.
 
I found this to be especially interesting, because there are so many references to pigeons in all of the episodes (the pigeons flying out of the room, in the first episode / the women feeding the pigeons in the second episode ... by the way, she was very big for a woman, had red hair, and a large ring ... I personally thought she looked suspicious ... really a man ... listening to Jane and Lisbon's conversation? / .... and then, in the 3rd episode, there was the pigeon flying at Sheriff McAllister).  I cannot quite make the connection of the birds, but somehow they are very significant.  And of course, it is obvious that pigeons and partridges strongly resemble one another.  To some, this might mean that Partridge isn't really dead or that perhaps RJ has a phobia of pigeons.  These could possibly be theories, but it is also possible they mean something else entirely, that the audience simply does not know yet.  Oh, by the way ... Didn't we also see pigeons flying out of the Red Barn in that episode?

I have not been one to think Partridge is alive, but yet, it isn't impossible, given everything we have seen.  In this regard, one thing that is noteworthy is the fact that we do not actually see Partridges' dead body, nor do we see the team attend the funeral, which seems quite unusual, given all of the funerals we have seen them attend.  Also, of interest is Blake's painting "A Brace of Partridge," in that Brace's poem "Tyger Tyger" has been quoted by RJ and his followers.

No matter who RJ turns out to be, I believe Heller will give his audience a lot of drama/intrigue when RJ is finally revealed.  I have no doubt that that there will be many connections revealed, that are not apparent just yet.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #6349 • By Cafered
Show this theory

why is bob kirkland the only red john suspect whose name does not appear on the list of guest stars in 06x06.....hmmmm.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

The only thing which can be said for sure is that Bruno Heller is good at intriguing people.
I've been reading this web-site for a long while and there've been plenty of different theories, some of which seemed plausible while others didn't.
We all know that according to Bruno Heller there's a big clue in the final sequence of s06e01.
Inspired by the idea of finding out who RJ is, I watched the episode several times.
Honestly speaking, I hope that the clue is not about how many pigeons there were or something like that. That would be very poetic but I guess that the clue is more evident, the problem is that at this stage we don't consider it to be significant.
What do you thing about CBI Ron talking on the phone right at the moment when RJ called Patrick?
I'm not accusing CBI Ron of being RJ - he is not charismatic enough. Doesn't that just seem suspicios to you? If this scene means nothing then why add it?
Let's discuss it? What are your thoughts about the clue in s06e01?

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely


Regarding Sheriff McAllister, just a small point for those focused on a strict interpretation of Loreli's handshake comment:

Isn't playing rock-paper-scissors essentially "handshaking?" In fact, given the playful nature of the Jane-RJ relationship, in story-telling terms, isn't this better than a formal handshaking?

In other words, doesn't the fact that McAllister and Jane played rock-paper-scissors say something even more telling than if they were to "shake" hands as normal people would?

And to those who will point out that Jane beat McAllister every time, isn't losing (and therefore seeming less than cunning) a great first move on RJ's part?

Just a few things to think about. Hope all of you are well.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on