Who is Red John?

All theories about

« See the other suspects

Brett Partridge

Brett Partridge
Suspected in 1k+ theories

THE THEORIES

If this truely is what we are gonna see Sunday, I would gladly this time wait a week for the next episode, so they can work some more on th storyline.

For a football game ---no

For this hell(Ner) yes

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Can someone please post a link to the leaked episode ?

PLEASE 

Cheers

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

I CRIED. I AM 18 YEARS OLD AND I CRIED. I SCREAMED SO HARD OF ANGER THAT I WOKE UP HALF OF THE NEIGHBERHOUD. FUCK YOU I KNOW MY SPELLING IS INCORRET. FUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!! WHAT A PIECE OF SHIIITTTT!!!!! FUCK YOU BRUNO HELLER. YOU HOULD NEVER BE ALOUD TO HOLD A PEN AGAIN. EVERY FUCKING THEORY WE MADE UP AND THIS COCKSUCER REVEALATION TURNS UP. WHYYYYYYYYYYY?!!!!!! EVERY MINUTE I HAVE SPENT ON THINKING OF RED JOHN.

BUT I SHALL LET YOU KNOW! IF THE LEAK IS FAKE AND AN EPIC REVEALATIONS TURNS OUT ON SUNDYA. YOU BRUNO HELLER, SIR, WILL GIV ME AN ORAGSM

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Heller is a GENIUS!!! He's messing with us and he is soooo damn good at it! How could anyone possibly think he would finish the RJ story like that? RJ - so well elaborated character, on which mental abilities they've worked for 6 years, ends up crying and calling 911 (hilarious part,btw :D ), without playing any mental chess with PJ, without anything?! Heller created RJ and PJ, people, for the love of god! :D Think about what he can do to our minds! :D    LOVE IT!!!

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

This comes from Philly.com, but I thought it was very good.

"An evil genius doesn’t explode a bomb in a room while he’s in it, risking being killed by flying debris or subsequent fire. That casts doubt on all five suspects who were in that room on Jane’s property during the explosion.So who could have been lurking, watching from a safe distance, if Heller's list is honest?Either of the first two dead suspects.Yes, we saw Robert Kirkland shot several times in the back, but remember how he said he had a twin?  Michael Kirkland supposedly worked with Red John and then was killed by him. But consider the old twin switcheroo, with the dead dude actually being Michael, who used his brother’s identity and cleaner record to land a career in law enforcement? That leaves Robert still alive and capable of being Red John.One flaw: Kirkland asked if he looked familiar, talking with a Red John associate, who said no. Maybe plastic surgery fixed that?That leaves Bret Partridge.Funny how we never actually saw him die. He acted and looked mortally wounded early this season when he was discovered by agent Lisbon, who turned away, then got snatched from behind.Funny how pigeons are seen in that house, and pigeon and partridge are synonyms.Funny how Partridge sounded the most like Red John.Funny how Partridge was introduced as a marginal character in the very first episode.Funny how agent Kimball Cho, on the last show, seeks out Partridge’s body and checks for a shoulder tattoo but never peeks at Partridge’s face.How could Patridge still be alive, while Lisbon and her colleagues clearly believe he’s dead?Uh, how about because, as we know, there’s a vast conspiracy adept at lying and faking evidence? How about because Partridge, as a forensic scientist, would know a thing or three about faux cadavers?The not-dead-yet scenario is also the way to explain the recording of Lorelai Martin naming the suspects. She simply made the recording after Jane made his list because she's still alive.Misdirection, made to look like magic.Makes sense for Red John to use such a ruse – and later set off a fuse to create a no-lose situation. If Jane dies, Red John wins. If everybody dies, Red John must be dead (but isn’t). If a suspect survives, he’ll wind up dead in a manhunt. Regardless, he’s alive.One big problem: Something Heller said before the season.“I can tell you it won’t be a sort of Ten Little Indians type of setup,” he told Entertainment Weekly.That Agatha Christie story, turned into a movie, has everybody on an island killed off one by one, with the killer turning out to be a supposed victim.Darn, I wish show’s producers and writers would refrain from spoiling some of the fun this way.It would fun to still be conjecturing about Red John being Grace Van Pelt.So if it’s not Bertram, isn’t Agatha Christie-like, and the Kirkland theory is too wacky (as are clones and zombies), then who? Another kind of identity fakeout? Some other so-and-so was really someone else? The Ray Haffner we knew was a Red John plant, while the real (and real twisted) Ray Haffner did the devilish deeds?Reede Smith had himself shot at to cover his tracks?Or “Red John” isn’t one person. It’s some kind of collective term. They all done it, like a seven-headed dragon? Maybe Martins and others who thought of Red John as just one man, because they’d met only one of the men."

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

I've watched the leaked episode.Its fake in my opinion.In the church
where McAllister(RJ)  talks to Jane ,the phrase "The game is over and I
won" it does not fit the voice pattern of McAllister.How the sheriff
speaks before and after that phrase does not match.I think is Partridge
or Ray Haffner.But considering the lady who feed the pigeons my bet is on Partridge.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

If that leaked episode isn't fake. I think McAllister isn't Red John, why we saw birds at the very first episode when Partridge was dying?... Because he faked his death like McAllister... But i hope that leaked episode is fake.. Not even gives goosebumps -_-

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on