For all of you f'ng toolbags who are too stupid or stubborn to do some research before posting, please read this:
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: After all that craftiness on Patrick Jane’s part, Red John is still a step ahead of him. So can we really trust that the list is accurate if Red John is so willing to confirm it?
Bruno Heller: Yes, we can trust that list. As much as much as Red John has been one step ahead, Lorelei Martins’ intervention changed the game. So as much as Red John is trying to play from a position of strength in reality Jane has gotten a lot closer. This last episode of the season really sets us up for next season: The hunt is on, no messing about.
Once again, you’re making moves that make me wonder if Patrick Jane is Red John — after all, how else could he know that memory from inside his head? But by saying Red John is definitely on the list, can we rule out the theory held by some fans that Jane is actually Red John?
Heller: I would say that definitively: Jane is not Red John.
SO ACCORDING TO THE SHOWS CREATOR: RED JOHN IS ON THE LIST OF 7 and JANE IS NOT RED JOHN.
Please take note of the 2 most important parts: First, although Heller doesnt say the words "definitely on the list" by not refuting the statement, he is saying that Red John is on the list of 7. Second, Jane is not Red John.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE pick one of the seven people on this list when posting or provide a credible theory as to why we should believe that Heller is lying to his fan base if you are foolish enough to choose someone who is not on the list.
