Theories of Kirkland (3)

For ( almost ) everyone on the list there is enough details, facts and
evidence to create a solid theory that he is Red John. I'v seen quite
enough theories for almost every person on the list, and all of them
seems to be plausible and believable. These was a McAllister theory just
now, and it makes sense. Not to mansion B. Partridge, Kirkland,
Bertrham, Stiles... The diference between them is how we personal see
the end of the show, and our individual opinions on the 'story' of red
john.
Is there enough evidence to reveal Red John ? By now, It is up
to every one of us individualy. Lets us to use our own imagination and
create the Red John we like him to be.
Who really gonna be RJ, is up to B. Heller's personal choice.

Just thoughts i Had To throw out of my head.
        
Couldn't a smart guy like Patrick Jane predict all of these facts and theories we are sharing here, and put together a logical story ?
-Red John started killing in the late 80',
-Jane heard Red John's voice,
-Rosalind Harker could be the girl Jane and his father tricked,
-B. Partridge's strange behavior towards Jane,
etc, etc ...

He would probably know, by analyzing all the suspects, who could probably manipulate with people so easy, be a cold blooded killer... I mean, he does this all the time in the ordinary murder cases.

Who could be Red John from all of this we saw in these 5 seasons ? -Depends on what story would B. Heller give us as finish. With a good detail in the end, everyone of these suspects could be Red John. Now, we can only assume.

My personal choice is B. Partridge with B. Stiles having a roll in all that mystery.