Who is Red John?

Share your own theory and rate other people’s

List of seven

Thomas McAllister
Thomas McAllister
Reede Smith
Reede Smith
Ray Haffner
Ray Haffner
Gale Bertram
Gale Bertram
Brett Partridge
Brett Partridge
Bret Stiles
Bret Stiles
Bob Kirkland
Bob Kirkland

LATEST THEORIES

Hello everyone - after reading a lot of theories and thinking about who Red John is for a long time - i finally would like to explain my latest thoughts. It's not really the try to finally determine who out of the 7 suspects is Red John - but some thoughts. 

So let's get started, right? 

Most important things first: I think, it COULD be Michael Kirkland. Now before you start yawning and screaming "no - he is dead, dude!" - let me explain. 

When Bob/Robert Kirkland explained his background story to Patrick in Episode S06x05 - what do we learn? 

We learn about his mother, his dad and his brother. 

His dad beat "the crap out of all of them". Until their mother left - with the razor-blade. That's what kicked my theory off. Bob left as well after some time. And when their dad died - michael become the alcoholic. Nothing new until yet. 

But then he met someone. As Bob said "someone who finally could help him". Or as Patrick said "More than that - a savior". 

Bob believes that it was Red John who helped Michael. But I'm not right sure about it. He never met him by himself (we know that because of..well then Bob would know Red John, right? :P ). 

Thinking of the time and the circumstances...couldn't be it that the person who helped Michael wasn't Red John but - Bret Stiles? 

Someone who helped him out of his misery, a "savior"  and someone who only wanted devotion and sacrafice in return. Does sound like the things that powerful cult-leaders are made of, doesn't it? 

So... the next thing: Despite the killing of the Janes , Dr. Towlen Morning and Panzer - we still don't know WHY Red John started killing. We do only know, that mosts of the time, he kills woman (after raping them) and then draws his mark somewhere. 

And why a smiley? A smiley, that also looks like it is crying? A symbol that many, many people would associate with something "childish"?

So let me start with my theory: 

What, if Red John is Michael Kirkland. And as Jack the Ripper was killing prositutes for avenging the doing's of his mother (which he hated) - Red John kills woman. He kills Mothers. His mother wasn't helping him or his brother when their dad beat them. They were probably crying and suffering like hell - but she didn't help. (maybe because she just didn't know how to). 

So Red John aka Michael is killing Woman - just because of his hateress of woman(but that also just an assumption) and paints a crying, childish face on the wall. If Jay Roth has no psychiatric history (no treatmens) - so doesn't Red John probably had some - so he never had help to get over all of that. He is out for blood and revenge.

Her mother killed herself with a razor blade - maybe is that (and the fact of the slow, painful dead) the reason why he uses knifes. 

But how could have Michael shook Patricks Hand? That's the fact I'm not finisehd with yet. Maybe he infiltrated CBI sometimes by playing his role as "Bob"? Not sure about that - but from a psychological point of view it would fit. 

Also - that would know why Bret Stiles knows who Red John is and is a little bit laughing when Patricks says "One of you is Red John"  - as Red John isn't in the room. Bret won't be Red John - he made more than one aspersion about Red John - and a person who's actions base on his ego won't do that. Someone who doesn't like to be slandered would not talk like this about himself. Even not to keep his disclorue up. 

Also what COULD be a fitting fact: He likes Teresa and spares her life. Maybe because he just wanted to send a message to Patrick via the sign on her face - or just not to end the game yet. Who knows. But maybe he likes her, because she suffered as a child as well - like Michael / Red John - she suffered under an alcoholic dad. 

So that's one of my theories. The other ones are "just" from tiger tiger (which i think is a very bad thing in the plot but it's okay). And Haffner..well...he is just acting weird and is a bit foolish about that or just doesn't recognise what his actions are looking like. Who knows. 

Thanks for reading! 

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

This is not a theory but a request, please dudes, tonight when the episode ends, please post the link to the episode!!

Thanks much!!!

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Guys, guys, guys...

Brett Partridge is NOT Red John because he is DEAD. Simple as that.

How could he fake his death? In 06x02 when Bertram gets to the scene, he is told that a dead body was found which belongs to Brett Partridge. How could it be that he escaped? I mean, if they found his body, they would have taken it to a morgue, investigated the death, etc. So either Brett is definitely dead and he is not Red John, either Bruno Heller thinks we are stupid and makes him Red John. If Partridge turns out to be Red John, then we do need an explanation as to how the hell he escaped without anyone knowing it for 5 episodes.

Something that is more likely, on the other hand, is Kirkland being Red John, because of his twin brother hanging around somewhere with no news about him. It's possible that Michael got shot instead of Bob.

One thing is sure : if it's Smith or McAllister, I will have wasted 5 years of my life.

But hey guys, don't expect anything epic, it won't be. I think when RJ is revealed, everyone is going to go WTF, it should be very disappointing. (Bruno Heller himself said so!!)


Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

If there's one thing I can't tolerate 


It's waiting for the episode to start.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

For those who want an exciting story and can appreciate a joke, here's mine.

Red John is the Joker theory:

Wayne Rigsby is Batman, and Bret Stiles is Alfred, his faithful butler. That's why Bret Stiles doesn't have a house in his own name and all his assets belong to Visualize- Batman has been using it to fund his exploits for years. Bret Stiles for the past months has been hiding in the batcave under Visualize buildings as Rigsby realizes he must protect the ones he loves as he gets ever closer to capturing the Joker.

Van Pelt is the Joker's daughter, and the Joker has been using her to get closer to him. But Wayne has caught on to this and is using this against her, to track the Joker down. In a move of genius, he marries her letting her finally think he will spill his secrets. Van Pelt tries to draw Stiles away to the Joker, but does not succeed. Rigsby finally has enough information to track down the Joker.

The woman feeding pigeons is Red John aka the Joker. Look at the long hair, the weird make up on her face. The smile he draws represents how the Joker had his mouth cut, and the smile is ironic, as the Joker's smile is a permanent blood red scar to his face.

On the day of reckoning, in the park, Batman assaults the Joker in a frenzied tazer attack. Usual Batman Vs Joker Rules dictate neither may kill the other one. "Why won't my directors ever let me kill you?!" says Rigsby. Jane follows Rigsby, and realises Red John is there. They're both writhing on the floor, drooling from the intensity of the tazer shocks. Patrick sees his chance and chokes Red John to death.

When Batman realises his favourite enemy is dead, he vows vengeance. Patrick has to flee to Mexico. Batman retreats into the shadows...waiting...watching.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Whilst scrolling through the site reading some theories, I read something fairly interesting..

One theory, I cannot remember which one, stated that McAllister was wearing a wedding ring before attending the meeting at Jane's house, but wasn't wearing it when he attended the meeting... This, by itself, of course, wouldn't mean anything, but do you still remember what Jared Renfrew wrote on the wall in his blood? "He is mar?" What if he actually wanted to write down [b]"He is married"[/b], but succumbed to his wounds before he finished?


I still believe Haffner is RJ but this would definitely be decent proof against McAllister.

By the way, I just rewatched S06E06 and the theory I referred to is [b]correct[/b]. When McAllister received the text stating the location, he was wearing a wedding ring. However, he wasn't wearing the ring at the meeting.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Red John after he bombed the garden house.
https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls2k1hwn1Y1r2zae8o1_r1_500.gif

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on