Who is Red John?

Share your own theory and rate other people’s

List of seven

Thomas McAllister
Thomas McAllister
Reede Smith
Reede Smith
Ray Haffner
Ray Haffner
Gale Bertram
Gale Bertram
Brett Partridge
Brett Partridge
Bret Stiles
Bret Stiles
Bob Kirkland
Bob Kirkland

LATEST THEORIES

Ray Haffner. Has to be. He brought the bomb. He tried to leave. He made sure he was out of harm's way. He's afraid of spiders--arachnophpbic, not acrophobic. Julia misspoke. Which is why they had that weird scene where he freaks when he sees the spider. Bertram works for him. He put Bertram in place to watch Jane. The confirmation of his death was from a Tyger Tyger coroner, the same guy who cut the tattoo out of Brett's shoulder. He's played by a Juilliard grad, so he has the chops, but he's voiced by Simon Baker. They'll explain that.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #12458 • By sam452
Show this theory

I have a feeling that RED JOHN is a women.
The clue states that " Red John is most likely a man". Then why can't it be a lady.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

In the 11th hour, I am changing my theory. Well, not so much changing my theory as I am accepting other theories as correct as well. I never thought I would end up with this conclusion but at the same time, it's the only thing that makes sense anymore. So here it is....

There are 3 Red John's. Yes, 3. That is why there are 3 dots on the tattoo. I am convinced that Partridge and McAllister are 2 of them but I'm not sure if the third is Bertram or Michael Kirkland. This is why so many of the clues lead us all in different directions. I'm sure only one of them killed Patrick's family and I have no idea which one but I think we are all going to get what we want in the end.

I watched this video of a guy watching an early screening of the show and that is when it all made sense. It is basically, an unholy trinity. I honestly can't believe that I have changed my mind in such a dramatic way, but I have.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Theory #12460 • By Aquahorseify
Show this theory

I get a feeling that all along someone in Tyger has been trying to take down Red John. The idea that red john began only killing girls for the most part is what they wanted to follow through. I believe red john did kill all at the barn, but moved on to only women, to teach them lessons. I think that the person who killed Jane's family is within Tyger, and wanted to get rid of Red John, or frame him. They knew that Jane would go after him like a hound, and so he was framed. The only ruthless one I can think of is Bertram. I believe that Bertram contacted Haffner or killed Janes family himself. Partridge knows this and has been trying VERY hard to gain Patricks trust. Think the situation with Betram and Timothy Carter; he knew what to tell him, etc. I think Jane knows Partridge is not his family's killed, but to make sure people understand the seriousness of catching Bertram, accuses Bertram. The way Partridge acts and such suggests e is god of Jane, but not enough to murder his family, even if he is prideful. He would not murder innocent children since he admires Jane so much. The fact Partridge not says Tyger Tyger before his death suggests he is still playing this "game" with the CBI, not willing to give up the killer to Jane so easily. The fact partridge stop plays this "game" tells me he is Red john. He could have given a name directly, or at least something more feasible. I think Jane is searching for Red John, but knows his family's killer is not the actual Red
john, but has became janes red john. Also, have you noticed the way van pelt was acting especially towards rigsby about the Tyger conspiracy?

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

One problem I've always had with the Partridge theory is that in the copycat murder case that Partridge is working he claims it to be RJ. We know RJ doesn't like to be slandered and hear it straight from his own mouth that he hates poor imitations of his work, yet as Partridge he is giving credit to the copycat killers as being RJ? It just goes completely against RJ's character to do that for any reason. I understand the "throwing Jane off" argument as the counter to that but I don't see that as a valid one considering it isn't necessary for him to do that to throw PJ off.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Forgot to add, has anyone got any idea about the coded file Van Pelt found on the flash drive? I assume maybe Jane has decoded it, possibly why he was at the church??? If anyone is any good at this sort of thing, PLEASE let us in on it..................!!!

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on