Who is Red John?

Share your own theory and rate other people’s

List of seven

Thomas McAllister
Thomas McAllister
Reede Smith
Reede Smith
Ray Haffner
Ray Haffner
Gale Bertram
Gale Bertram
Brett Partridge
Brett Partridge
Bret Stiles
Bret Stiles
Bob Kirkland
Bob Kirkland

LATEST THEORIES

Reading this essay made me think of how Heller failed artistically with the Red John reveal.


It's called "The Art of Misdirection" 
http://www.writingclasses.com/FacultyBios/facultyArticleByInstructor.php/ArticleID/42

A good read, and I especially like the distinction made in this quote:


"Please note...."that we’re speaking of misdirection, not misinformation."


1.  The writer gives enough misdirection to distract the audience from the truth of the story -- like the magician does with the pretty girl.  But then the writer would have to KNOW HIS STORY in order to pull this off [like a magician knows his trick]

2.  Heller was a bad magician --  he did not know the truth of his story from the beginning.  He did not know who RJ was going to be.

3.  Thus, the "clues" we were fed were not clues at all if Heller did not know who RJ was.  They were also NOT red herrings, and as this essay points out --- they were not misdirection. 


4.  EVERYTHING WE WERE SHOWN PRIOR TO Lorelie claiming Jane shook RJ's hand WAS PURE MISINFORMATION.  In other words, a LIES.


5.  Heller clearly decided on McRJ somewhere around the end of Season 5.  It is very easy now to see where the Mentalist started to become an entirely different show.



Another quote from the article:
"The writer should never lie to the reader, but, if necessary, should allow the reader to lie to herself."


7.  Our heads should have been swirling upon the point of the RJ REVEAL -- as we thought back to all the wonderful misinformation we'd been given over 5 years...and all the ideas we made up surrounding it, realizing that we'd had our POV expertly manipulated in the best way possible.
8.   My point:  we were not given genuine misdirection.  Genuine misdirection leads somewhere, it is EXPLAINED regardless of the outcome of the story.  There was no trick to be enjoyed for the audience because the trick was on us.  We were the trick and it's hard to enjoy the fruits of our efforts -- when there was no audience payoff.  
9.  Please do not give Heller any credit for having used his craft, do not call all the details we were fed "red herrings."  True misdirection, along with well placed red herrings, are GOOD and necessary as a part of the journey of any artful, suspenseful mystery story that leave an audience satisfied.
10.  Heller relied on MISINFORMATION aka LIES...that led nowhere.  Heller let us lie to ourselves while he lied to us, too -- that is why he told us we'd be "disappointed" because...

Misdirection [red herrings] = leads to surprise

Misinformation [lies] = leads to disappointment


Heller was a bad magician who switched his trick midstream.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

I've read somewhere that Bruno Heller was seriously considering the idea of collecting as many shovels (as well as volunteers) as possible for a trip to the New Mexico desert.
Each contributor would be given a copy of 'ET : the game' on Atari ...


Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

After seeing the promo for the next episode, I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but Lisbon and Jane are going to get together in the end. I think it's obvious now.

It will probably not be 'full on getting together', they will just make us suspect that they have a future together. Very strange! I feel like they have an idea the show will be cancelled, so they want to give the fans the whole Jisbon thing, as a thank you for supporting the series during the years..

I honestly can't believe some of you are still holding out hope for Red John, but I admire you in some way, you have patience and belief..:)  I've given up a long time ago! 

Everybody, enjoy the last episodes, it's been fun being the part of this website! xx


Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

My new theory is about Marcus Pike and the purpose he is serving in the show recently. If what I think is correct, I think that he was sent by Red John the matchmaker to seduce Lisbon so Patrick would be jealous, confess his love, and live peacefully before he start digging again in his memories for answers. However, I believe that PJ is aware of what is happening and knows that RJ will never leave him alone. As for why I think RJ is still alive and doing well is because Bruno Pigeon Heller left us with so many hanging threads.

Here is the press release for the season finale (or the series finale)

A REOPENED COLD CASE COULD BE THE LAST TIME THAT JANE AND LISBON WORK TOGETHER UNLESS HE’S ABLE TO ADMIT HIS TRUE FEELINGS FOR HER, ON THE SIXTH SEASON FINALE OF “THE MENTALIST,” SUNDAY, MAY 18

“Blue Bird” – A new lead in a cold case requires Lisbon to delay her plans to leave for Washington, D.C. with Agent Pike, giving Jane time to finally come to terms with his feelings for her and decide on a course of action., on the sixth season finale of THE MENTALIST, Sunday, May 18 (10:00-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

CHEAT TWEET: Will Jane lose Lisbon 4ever? 1 case gives him a last chance to admit his feelings! #TheMentalist season finale 5/18 10pm http://bit.ly/1mj5pjx 

SERIES REGULARS:
Simon Baker (Patrick Jane)
Robin Tunney (Teresa Lisbon) 
Tim Kang (Kimball Cho) 
Owain Yeoman (Wayne Rigsby) 
Amanda Righetti (Grace Van Pelt)
Rockmond Dunbar (FBI Agent Dennis Abbott)
Emily Swallow (Kim Fischer)

RECURRING CAST:
Joe Adler (Wiley)
Pedro Pascal (Marcus Pike)

GUEST CAST:
Skylar Brown (Colt)
Josiah Blount (Barry)
Kara Royster (Kiley)
James Austin Kerr (Vince)
Genesis Sol (Randa)
Vincent Spano (Don De Jorio)
Nicole Cannon (Megan Shapiro De Jorio)
Jason Brooks (Ted Randolph)
Haley Hudson (Christie De Jorio)
Victoria Smurfit (Monica Giraldi)
DeWanda Wise (Tanya Dean)
George Finn (Wes Baxter)
Nicole Greenwood (Receptionist)
Jodi Fung (TSA Officer)
Jessica Hopper (Stewardess)
Darren Dupree Washington (Air Marshal)
Cinda Adams (Middle-aged Lady)
Michael Dean Connolly (Well-groomed Man)
William Duffy (TSA Agent #2)
Blue Deckert (Chief Muller)
Orestes Arcuni (Waiter)
Elizabeth Deo (Airline Clerk)

WRITTEN BY: Bruno Heller
DIRECTED BY: Chris Long

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

You know I always thought that episode 8 being Kim Fischer's dream was plausible, because the little girl in the house that RJ crashes through looks so much like Kim. And the episode was so weird and stupid, like any person's dream. The only problem would be explaining it to the viewership. I mean how do you convey later on that it was a dream, and specifically Fischer's dream? I know it would be a bullshit move, but recently everything is a bullshit move.

We know Jane is going to have to answer for the events of episode 8, in the next episode. 

*MINI SPOILER* Kim Fischer actually gets shot next episode. *MINI SPOILER* This is a great way for her to pass out, and re-visit the same dream and little bits of episode 8 flash through her head, ending with McAllister crashing through the glass door. Then she wakes up in hospital. 

Lisbon: "It's ok. You're safe."
Fischer: "Oh, just... dream... Did Jane ever tell you what Red John said when they met?"
Lisbon: "No... I never asked."
Fischer: "Well, we'll find out tomorrow."
Lisbon: "Yea..."

Next Scene.

Jane is in front of the grand jury. *Enter the real flashback encounter of Red John/Patrick Jane.* Jane explains everything, from RJ's operations all the way to how he escaped into Mexico with an old guy who had an uncanny resemblance to Bret Stiles. Or just the important stuff would be nice. At this point, anything would be nice.

- I know this probably will not happen, but who knows...maybe, just maybe Bruno Heller has a pigeon up his sleeve - 

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

jane gets arrested and female lawyer`s dress is red in court.  Did you notice?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJnv0Wfiyek

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Hello,

At first sorry for my bad english but french is my mother tongue.

If you go tohttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt3275764/?ref_=tt_ep_ep21, Jack Plotnick (Brett Partridge) is credited as Red John.... And in episode 22, he's credited as Partridge.

What do you think about that?

Thanks and have a good day.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on